User talk:AntiCompositeNumber

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1, 2, 3, 4

Images copyright tag fixed[edit]

Hi. Thank you for noticing the error in my uploads by AntiCompositeBot. All was fixed (I have a new laptop and lost Pattypan uploads settings so the copyright tag was ommitted from the uploading table). I would like to ask you to remove the tags. Thanks! Aktron (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aktron ✓ Done You could have removed the bot tags yourself while adding the license. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Key Bridge Response 2024 (240330-G-ZP826-6978).jpg[edit]

The crane in there is not the Farrell 256, which has some red-colored elements at the top of the crane. Rather that is a crane of Seaward Marine , of which I have found almost nothing. I think it's the same one as seen in this video, but I'm not entirely sure. That video showed a marking of "OLM-0026" on it , with the name "Olmsted" in smaller type below it (and something following I can't make out) but I can't find anything under that name online. I think the yellow crane in some shots is working alongside this one (that video has a similar one, which is just a regular mobile crane driven onto a barge). Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it back to Category:Crane barges. I've also had difficulty finding information on the crane barges. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clindberg I've been able to find the barge that the smaller yellow crane is on. According to [1] it's the Hughes Marine Firms "Hughes 2001" under contract to Seward with a Liebherr crane on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1bfrpYZecg&t=77 has a LR 1300 SX model number visible, which matches the 330 ton crane mentioned in [2]. Not sure how to best express that in category form. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AntiCompositeNumber Wow, well done. I created Category:Hughes 2001 (ship, 2004). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clindberg Looks like the Army Corps had a blue 60' Manitowoc platform ringer crane on a barge at their Olmstead, Illinois project but auctioned it off a few years ago. https://industrialscenery.blogspot.com/2020/03/usace-had-two-60-ringer-cranes.html has some pictures, unfortunately the GSA auction is a dead link. That page has a comment saying that they removed the crane from the original barge, but [3] shows them also auctioning a bunch of barges off too. No idea what Seaward calls the barge, crane, or barge-crane assembly though. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That must be it. The auction site is here; those photos would be {{PD-USGov-GSA}}. The auction stated the barge was not included, but given that "Olmsted Dam" is the most likely inscription I saw, you do wonder (or as you say, maybe also bought the barge separately, or switched to one they did buy). That would also explain why I can't find much under that old name, since government ships don't need to be registered anywhere, and it may not really be the name. It must have a name now though. Seems like the crane is from 1978, but finding the barge... may be harder. But more to search for, thanks. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Ben Avraham raising his hands moments before his killing.jpg[edit]

Hello AntiCompositeNumber, I see that you're a Commons admin, could you help me double check if this photo qualifies for public domain? I believe it is a screenshot from one of the copies of this video. Thank you. Starship.paint (talk) 14:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint Ask at COM:VPC. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Starship.paint (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag[edit]

User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Apometria Bioenergética (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AntiCompositeNumber&oldid=865649562"