User talk:Robert Flogaus-Faust

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyoscyamus albus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ophrys holoserica 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laserpitium nitidum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa pendulina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium monspessulanum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daphne mezereum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aster alpinus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digitalis purpurea 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clematis recta 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gagea pratensis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corydalis cava 3 RF 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viburnum lantana 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alliaria petiolata 5 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viburnum lantana 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris quadrifolia 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support looks good. --RZuo 09:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viburnum lantana 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium galeobdolon subsp argentatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suaeda maritima RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
For best use of this image in the future, GPS coordinates would be helpful, as would information in the description as to the type of habitat where this plant was found. --GRDN711 11:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I added a little bit more information to the decriptions, but the photo was taken in 2007 and there is no way to get reasonable coordinates for almost all of my old images. I'll add a comment to your talk page for the rest of my answer. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Support with image description changes. --GRDN711 13:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellaria holostea 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corydalis solida 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]